Демократический аудит Македонии: методология мониторинга
В своем тезисе я пытаюсь объяснить создание демократии в Республике Македонии. Со времени своей независимости в 1991 году и изменения ее системы от социалистического до парламентского демократического типа управления Македония пытается внедрить демократию. Имеет ли Македония стабильную демократию или нет, а если не то, что должна сделать Македония, чтобы построить демократический потенциал с принципами благого управления? Ответы на эти и другие вопросы даются и объясняются в этой работе. Диссертация разделена на две части. Первая часть – сравнительный социально-экономический анализ между Словенией и Македонией. Словения взята в качестве примера, потому что страна имеет много общего с Македонией. Словения была частью той же федерации Югославии с Македонией, она имела ту же систему управления, она имеет более или менее одинаковый размер территории и населения по сравнению с Македонией, это новая демократия (почти 30 лет, как и Македония) и сейчас парламентская демократическая система. Помимо этих сходств Словения гораздо более развита, чем Македония, и я приводил пример этого с помощью различных социально-экономических показателей, таких как: ВВП, уровень безработицы, среднемесячный доход, отчеты Freedom House, статистика Всемирного банка, индекс демократии и т. д. В конце я объясню, почему Словения стала успешной. Вторая часть посвящена центральному исследовательскому вопросу этого тезиса, а именно: что должна сделать Македония, чтобы построить стабильную демократическую систему спустя почти 30 лет с тех пор, как она стала парламентской демократией? Я вижу ответ на этот вопрос в работе американского социолога Сеймура Мартина Липсета, в частности его статью «Социальные реквизиты демократии». Здесь он дает, какие факторы и реквизиты имеют решающее значение для страны, чтобы иметь демократию. Объясняются такие факторы, как экономика, верховенство закона и экономический порядок, политическая культура, политические партии, участие граждан, права меньшинств, избирательные системы и т. д. Я беру эти факторы, объясняю их и сравниваю их с нынешней ситуацией в Македонии. Как Македония делает по каждому фактору, что еще нужно делать и т. д. Анализируются различные отчеты, научные статьи, аналитические документы, статистические данные, чтобы дать ответ на каждый фактор, а также дальнейшая рекомендация. Особое внимание уделяется факторам – избирательным системам, поскольку я думаю, и я объясняю, что изменение избирательной системы может повлиять на другие факторы, которые имеют решающее значение для стабильности демократических возможностей округа. Я отмечаю, что некоторые условия очень важны, в то время как некоторые из них не имеют большого значения, но все же они необходимы. В любом случае некоторые из них являются относительными и могут быть важными в данный момент времени и в контексте. Вот почему разные страны могут по-разному реагировать на некоторые реквизиты, и это во многом зависит от конкретной ситуации и других условий.
The main focus of this analysis is the democratization process in the Republic of Macedonia. It is a country situated in South Eastern Europe on the Balkan Peninsula. It gained independence from Yugoslavia in 1991 and since then the country keeps trying to implement democracy; although the country is declared democracy still in practice there is a lack of democracy. The issue of making attempts for democratization will be discussed and analyzed. The main reason for choosing this topic for the thesis is the wish of the Macedonians to have real democracy in their country, to have stable and effective institutions, to have good governance led by credible politicians and to have stability and prosperity once and for all, because with the help of different indicators and statistics we will see that there is not so developed democracy in the country.
The thesis is separated in two parts. The first part is dedicated to the comparative analysis between the socio – economic and political indicators of the Republic of Slovenia and Republic of Macedonia. Slovenia was chosen for the analysis because it has the same size of territory and population, because both of them have parliamentary democracies as type of political system of the countries, and most of all because it is ex-communist country; it was a part of the same federation of Yugoslavia along with Macedonia. These factors influenced on the decision for comparing Macedonia with Slovenia. Having many similarities, still both of the countries are very different in regards of development. We will see in the first part that Slovenia is way ahead of Macedonia. Comparative statistical analysis is going to be used to prove this. The following indicators are used for the analysis: United Nations Human Development Index, Gini coefficient, GDP, GDP per capita, unemployment rate, average monthly salaries, Freedom House report for 2017, and Democracy Index report for 2016.
This means that we will pay attention not only on the economic factors that influence the democracy and the development of the country, but also socio political factors and reports will be taken into consideration, so we could have one general understanding and proof of the comparison and the fact that Slovenia is more developed in any sense important for the democracy. Comparative and descriptive research methods are used in this part where all the previously mentioned indicators are compared and explained each so we can have clearer image. Statistical socio – economic and political analysis is made, where credible sources are taken for argumentation, such as: UN reports, World Bank reports, Eurostat, Freedom House reports and statistics, State Statistical Offices of both of the countries etc. At the end of the first part of the thesis, an explanation is given on – Why is Slovenia so successful? Which factors were crucial for the country to become that developed, from ex – communist authoritarian state, to capitalistic democratic republic? Special attention will be putted on the days before and after the independence of the country. The main focus will be the approaches and steps that were taken by the Slovenian politicians and their seriousness in emerging to independent state. We will conclude that some of the factors of stabilization are beyond human control, but on contrary they have natural background. The main question at the end of the first part will be – What Slovenia did? Which steps and approaches were taken? But the central moment of this thesis is the democratization process in Macedonia. So, the main question is what should Macedonia do so to have stable democracy and prosperous life for its citizens? Which steps and approaches should the Macedonians make so to move forward? The answers of these questions are given in the second part of this thesis.
In the second part of the thesis, detailed analysis of the article of Seymour Martin Lipset “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited” published in 1994 in the academic journal American Sociological Review is provided. In this article, Lipset gives explanation of all the conditions that could influence the democracy and the democratic processes, with some practical examples of different countries. The following factors and indicators are presented: economy, political culture, religion and minorities, legitimacy, executive systems, civil society and citizens’ participation, political parties, rule of law and economic order and at the end the electoral systems. Each of these factors are explained from the point of view of Lipset, and compared with the actual situation in the Republic of Macedonia. Every prerequisite has its own importance for implementing democracy in a country, and that is why each of them is important for our analysis. At the very beginning, as it will follow from time to time, I will note that each factor may “act” different in a given situation, or in a given country. For example the factor electoral system could be important for some post-communist country, rather than for some developed democratic country of a western type, and so on. That is why these factors are not universal and they shouldn’t be taken for granted all of them and implemented in a country. Moreover, they are relative and they could work differently in different countries. However what is important for us is the case in Macedonia and the situation with the democracy in the country. As mentioned above, we are going to analyze the steps and approaches that Macedonia should take so to “move on” further to become more democratic country. Those steps are the requisites which are recommended by Lipset in his article; further we are going to see what the actual state in the country is for each factor and what it needs to be done further.
My thinking is that, if each of these factors is taken seriously by the authorities, then Macedonia could have stable democracy in near future, 10 years more or less. One of the most important factors or as I am going to name them, primary factors are: economy and rule of law, civil society and citizens’ participation and electoral systems. Here I mark that the importance of the free market, lower taxes, less bureaucracy and interference from the government in the private (social and most of all economic) relations between the individuals, minimal State concept; participation of the citizens in the everyday social and political life by NGOs or other groups or individually; and as maybe the most important – the electoral system of the country, are factors which need to have special treatment and further discussion and development for the particular country and its democracy. Just to add that the importance of the electoral system is so big, which means by changing the electoral system you can change and influence many other factors which are also crucial for democratic development. I give special attention for this at the end in the second part of the thesis.
Comparative analysis is used in the second part, between the Lipset’s article and the situation in Macedonia with the help of the descriptive and exploratory approaches. Relevant sources are taken to complete this part of the thesis, such as Macedonian and international think tanks reports, institutions’ analyses, articles, research papers etc.
1. Human Development Index data, http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
2. Gini coefficient by countries http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/income-gini-coefficient
3. Difference between GDP nominal and GDP real, https://applebutterdreams.wordpress.com/the-difference-between-gdp-nominal-and-gdp-ppp/
4. Statistical Office of Macedonia Data, http://www.stat.gov.mk/PrikaziSoopstenie_en.aspx?rbrtxt=98
5. Freedom House Methodology of estimation, https://freedomhouse.org/report/methodology-fact-sheet
6. Freedom House report by countries, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2017#anchor-one
7. Freedom House report for Slovenia, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2017/slovenia
8. Freedom House report for Macedonia, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2017/macedonia
9. Report for the average wage from the Statistical Office of Slovenia, http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/News/Index/7077
10. Report for the whole 2017 by month average wages by Trading Economics, https://tradingeconomics.com/slovenia/wages
11. Report for average wage in Macedonia from the Statistical Office of Macedonia, http://www.stat.gov.mk/PrikaziSoopstenie_en.aspx?rbrtxt=40
12. About Economist Intelligence Unit, http://www.eiu.com/home.aspx#about
13. About Democracy Index, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index
14. Types of regimes according to the Democracy Index, “Democracy Index 2015: Democracy in an age of anxiety” (PDF) https://www.yabiladi.com/img/content/EIU-Democracy-Index-2015.pdf
15. The EIU info graphic for 2016, https://infographics.economist.com/2017/DemocracyIndex/
16. World Bank web site data
17. Eurostat web site data
18. The Yugoslav War: Answers to the Ten Most Important Questions, Spiegel Online, July, 2016, http://www.spiegel.de/international/tomorrow/the-yugoslav-war-questions-and-answers-a-1100795.html
19. Yugoslavia: Trends in Ethnic Nationalism, CIA report, https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP84S00895R000100040008-8.pdf
20. SERBIAN AND CROATIAN NATIONALISM AND THE WARS IN YUGOSLAVIA, Cultural Survival, June, 1995, https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/serbian-and-croatian-nationalism-and-wars-yugoslavia
21. Slovenia: From Yugoslavia to the European Union / edited by Mojmir Mrak, Matija Rojec, Carlos Silva – Jauregui, Chapter 5: Transition to a National and Market Economy: A Gradualist Approach, Joze Mencinger, 2004, http://www.pf.uni-lj.si/media/mencinger_chap05_101-116.pdf
22. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, Volume 17, Issue 2, Lea Prijon, Slovenian Communist Legacy: After 25 Years of Independence of Slovenian Nation, 2017, https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/sjps.2017.17.issue-2/sjps-2017-0006/sjps-2017-0006.pdf
23. Jože Mencinger interview, John Feffer, Huffington Post, August 2013, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-feffer/slovenias-gradualist-tran_b_4594469.html
24. Dahl Robert, On Democracy, Yale University Press, August 2000, p.37
25. Seymour Martin Lipset, The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited: 1993 Presidential Address, American Sociological Review, Vol. 59, No. 1 (Feb., 1994), pp. 1-22
26. Unemployment rate in Macedonia for 2017, State Statistical Office report, http://www.stat.gov.mk/PrikaziSoopstenie_en.aspx?rbrtxt=98
27. Index of Economic Freedom report, Macedonia, Heritage Foundation 2017 http://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2017/countries/macedonia.pdf
28. http://www.heritage.org/index/country/macedonia
29. Freedom House report for Macedonia, 2017 https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2017/macedonia
30. Religious groups in Macedonia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_Republic_of_Macedonia
31. Population in Macedonia, State Statistical Office report, http://www.stat.gov.mk/Publikacii/PDFSG2016/03-Naselenie-Population.pdf
32. Ohrid Framework Agreement, http://www.osce.org/skopje/100622?download=true
33. Constitution of The Republic of Macedonia, http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/mk/mk014en.pdf
34. Lars Jerker Lock, A Conflict Analysis: Macedonia, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, October 2003, http://www.sida.se/contentassets/a4319f99cc124339800aecd53db36bfa/macedonia-a-conflict-analysis_936.pdf
35. Weber Max, “The Three Types of Legitimate Rule”, Berkeley Publications in Society and Institutions, 1958
36. Sholes, Kyle () “Political Legitimacy in the Arab World: The Impact of the Arab Spring on Saudi Arabia and Egypt,” Liberated Arts: a journal for undergraduate research: Vol. 2: Iss. 1,Article 8. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=lajur
37. Eurobarometer report for Macedonia, 2016 http://meta.mk/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/eb85_fact_fyrom_en.pdf
38. Eurobarometer: Macedonian citizens don’t trust judiciary, police, political parties, September 2017 https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2017/09/12/eurobarometer-macedonian-citizens-dont-trust-judiciary-police-political-parties/
39. How the French Government works, http://www.gouvernement.fr/en/how-government-works
40. Institutions of the Fifth Republic, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2e/Institutions_of_the_Fifth_Republic.svg
41. Smith Reiss, US political system: How does it work? Senate, House of Representatives and more explained, November, 2016, https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/729708/us-election-2016-senate-house-of-representatives-political-system-explained-how-work
42. Joyce Chepkemoi, What Type Of Government Does Macedonia Have, August, 2017, https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-type-of-government-does-macedonia-have.html
43. Governmental structure of Macedonia, http://makedonija.name/government
44. Sazdevski Marija, Gjuzelov Borjan, Ivanoska Natasha; Government mirror 2015: Public Participation in the Law-Making Processes, Macedonian Center for International Cooperation, Skopje, May 2016, http://mcms.org.mk/images/docs/2016/government-mirror-2015.pdf
45. Огненовска Симона, Траковска Симона, Извештај за овозможувачка околина за развој на граѓанското општество во Македонија 2016, Македонски центар за меѓународна соработка (МЦМС), Скопје, 2017, http://mcms.mk/images/docs/2017/izveshtaj-za-ovozmozhuvachkata-okolina-za-razvoj-na-gragjanskoto-opshtestvo-vo-makedonija-2016.pdf
46. Cvetanova Ganka; Pachovski Veno; Bojadzievska Irena: Republic of Macedonia and Citizens Participation in the Digital Age: Where Do We Stand? In: European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 5 (2016), 4, pp. 20-36, http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/48656/ssoar-eqpam-2016-4-cvetanova_et_al-Republic_of_Macedonia_and_Citizens.pdf?sequence=1
47. European Commission report on e-Government in Macedonia, 2017, https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/inline-files/eGovernment_in_FYROM_March_2017_v2_00.pdf
48. Sinisa Jakov Marusic, Macedonia’s DUI Ambiguous About Joining New Govt, January 2017, http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/macedonia-s-dui-party-sends-conflicting-tones-about-new-govt–01-26-2017
49. Macedonia: Key political parties, Balkan Insight, http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/macedonia-key-political-parties-11-21-2016
50. List of political parties in the Republic of Macedonia, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_the_Republic_of_Macedonia
51. Results of the Parliamentary elections in Macedonia, State Election Commission of Macedonia, December 2016, https://rezultati2016.sec.mk/Parliamentary/Results?cs=en-US&r=r&rd=r1&eu=All&m=All
52. Hobbes Thomas, De Cive, pp. 11, http://www.unilibrary.com/ebooks/Hobbes,%20Thomas%20-%20De%20Cive.pdf
53. What is corruption, Transparency International, https://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption
54. 2016 Corruption Perceptions Index, Transparency International report, https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016
55. Press Release on the 2017 Report of the Senior Experts’ Group on systemic Rule of Law issues in the Republic of Macedonia, https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/news_corner/news/press-release-2017-report-senior-experts-group-systemic-rule-law-issues-former_en
56. Short article on Priebe’s report, MIA, September 2017, http://www.mia.mk/en/Inside/RenderSingleNews/61/133858830#
57. The full Priebe report, September 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/2017.09.14_seg_report_on_systemic_rol_issues_for_publication.pdf
58. Doing Business Economy Rankings, http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings
59. Doing Business 2018: Macedonia Continues to Be Among the Top Ranked Economies, October 2017, http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2017/10/31/doing-business-2018-fyr-macedonia-continues-to-be-among-top-ranked-economies
60. Hernán Büchi Buc, How Chile Successfully Transformed Its Economy, September 2006, http://www.heritage.org/international-economies/report/how-chile-successfully-transformed-its-economy
61. Electoral system, Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/electoral-system
62. Parliamentary institute of the Assembly of Republic of Macedonia, Parliamentary Elections in Republic of Macedonia, 2014, https://www.sobranie.mk/content/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%20%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83%D1%82/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%20%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8_ENG.pdf
63. Митко Р. Јовановски, Граѓаните се за нов, а не за износен и закрпен модел, Нова Македонија, бр.23556
64. Илија Јованов, https://www.pravdiko.mk/za-izbornite-modeli/, September 2015, За изборните модели, https://www.pravdiko.mk/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/izbornite-modeli.pdf
65. Inter – Parliamentary Union archives, Historical Archive of Parliamentary Election Results, http://archive.ipu.org/parline/reports/2313_arc.htm
66. Turli tava, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turli_Tava
67. Interview with prof. Gordana Siljanovska: Изборните модели не се менуваат како чорапи, Дневник, бр. 2468 од 18.03.2006
68. Sinisa Jakov Marusic, Balkan Insight, August 2015, Macedonia PM’s ‘Bonus MPs’ Plan Rejected, http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/macedonia-parties-reject-pms-idea-for-bonus-mps-08-24-2015
69. Chrysa Lamprinakou, Electoral System Change in Europe since 1945: Greece, p.36, http://www.electoralsystemchanges.eu/Files/media/MEDIA_198/FILE/Greece_summary.pdf
70. Gordana Siljanovska-Davkova, Organizational Structures and Internal Party Democracy in the R. of Macedonia; Organizational Structures and Internal Party Democracy in South Eastern Europe, Friedrich – Ebert – Stiftung Institute for Political and Legal Studies, GorexPress, Sofia, 2005, p. 56, http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sofia/05506.pdf
71. MPs 1998 – 2002, web site of the Macedonian Parliament, https://www.sobranie.mk/last-structure-74553078-156f-4ff1-9f16-a66f50eae21e.nspx
72. Sinisa Jakov Marusic, Balkan Insight, Macedonia’s Small Parties Demand Election Reform, 2013, http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/macedonia-s-small-parties-push-for-better-representation
Читать «Демократический аудит Македонии: методология мониторинга»
Последние выполненные заказы
Хочешь уникальную работу?
Больше 3 000 экспертов уже готовы начать работу над твоим проектом!
5 (21 отзыв)
5 (22 отзыва)
5 (44 отзыва)
4.9 (522 отзыва)
4.8 (211 отзывов)
4.8 (2878 отзывов)
4.6 (71 отзыв)
4.5 (330 отзывов)
4.6 (30 отзывов)
