Цель исследования – выявить влияние состава совета директоров на финансовые и нефинансовые результаты компании с помощью посреднического фактора раскрытия информации о КСО.
Задачи:
1. Обосновать актуальность исследования;
2. Разработать концептуальную модель;
3. Определить подходящий исследовательский подход,
включая сбор данных и анализ данных;
4. Проверить модель на основе эмпирического
исследования;
5. Предложить рекомендации для исследователей по
дальнейшему развитию темы и для практиков по подходам к раскрытию информации о КСО и составу совета директоров.
Основные результаты:
Нелинейная модель PLS-SEM, построенная с помощью WarpPLS 6.0, подтвердила несколько гипотез:
1. Количество членов совета директоров негативно
влияет на раскрытие информации о КСО в отношении
окружающей среды и услуг;
2. Количество женщин в совете директоров
положительно влияет на раскрытие информации о КСО (в отношении окружающей среды, работников и услуг);
3. Раскрытие информации о КСО в отношении услуг положительно влияет на финансовые результаты;
4. Раскрытие информации о КСО в целом и в частности
услуг положительно влияет на нефинансовые
результаты;
5. Количество женщин в совете директоров
положительно влияет на нефинансовые показатели через посреднический эффект раскрытия информации о КСО.
Были даны рекомендации для академического сообщества и бизнеса.

Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7
1. Theoretical analysis of the influence of board of directors’ composition and CSR disclosure on company performance ………………………………………………………………………………………………….9
2.
1.1 Board of directors and its impact on company performance………………………………………….9
1.1.1 Introduction to board of directors ………………………………………………………………………..9
1.1.2 Board of directors and its role in a company ……………………………………………………….10
1.1.3 Board of directors’ influence on CSR and its disclosure……………………………………….11 1
.1.4 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..14
1.2 CSR disclosure and its impact on company performance ……………………………………………14 1.2.1 CSR definition ………………………………………………………………………………………………..14 1.2.2 CSR disclosure ……………………………………………………………………………………………….15 1.2.3 CSR disclosure and company performance…………………………………………………………18 1.2.4 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..19
1.3 Research model……………………………………………………………………………………………………..19 1.3.1 Research model structure………………………………………………………………………………….19 1.3.2 Research hypotheses………………………………………………………………………………………..22 1.3.3 Conceptual model ……………………………………………………………………………………………26
1.4. Summary of Chapter 1…………………………………………………………………………………………..27 Development of research design for analysis and collection of data from banking industry28
2.1 Determination of research method …………………………………………………………………………..28 2.1.1 Determining the purpose of the research …………………………………………………………….28 2.1.2 Determining the research model………………………………………………………………………..29
2.2 Methodology of data collection ……………………………………………………………………………….30 2.2.1 Choice of banking industry……………………………………………………………………………….31 2.2.2 CSR Disclosure evaluation ……………………………………………………………………………….31 2.2.3 Sources of information …………………………………………………………………………………….33
2.3. Determination of data analysis method ……………………………………………………………………37 2.3.1 Foundation for choosing SEM-Methods …………………………………………………………….37 2.3.2 Foundation for choosing PLS-SEM method ……………………………………………………….38 2.3.3 Foundation for choosing the non-linear PLS-SEM method …………………………………..40 2.3.4 Foundation for choosing the WarpPLS 6.0. software …………………………………………..40
5
2.3.5 Description of the criteria to analyze the model results ………………………………………..40
2.4 Summary of Chapter 2……………………………………………………………………………………………43
3. Data analysis and development of recommendations for board of directors and CSR disclosure practices in banking industry ……………………………………………………………………………………………44
3.1 Sample and descriptive statistics ……………………………………………………………………………..44 3.1.1 Distribution by countries ………………………………………………………………………………….44 3.1.2 Distribution by number of employees ………………………………………………………………..45 3.1.3 Distribution by board size…………………………………………………………………………………45 3.1.4 Distribution by number of women on board ……………………………………………………….46 3.1.5 Distribution by CEO duality ……………………………………………………………………………..47 3.1.6 Distribution by profitability ………………………………………………………………………………47 3.1.7 Distribution by ROA ……………………………………………………………………………………….48 3.1.8 Distribution by Sales ……………………………………………………………………………………….48 3.1.9 Distribution by Brand rating……………………………………………………………………………..49 3.1.10 Distribution by CSR disclosure ……………………………………………………………………….49 3.1.11 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………54
3.2 Analysis of the model …………………………………………………………………………………………….54 3.2.1 Step by step approach to conduct PLS-SEM model……………………………………………..54 3.2.2 Outer and inner models…………………………………………………………………………………….55 3.2.3 Models fit and quality indices …………………………………………………………………………..57 3.2.4 Hypotheses summary……………………………………………………………………………………….61
3.3 Discussion of the results …………………………………………………………………………………………63 3.3.1 Results discussion……………………………………………………………………………………………63 3.3.2 Managerial implications …………………………………………………………………………………..65 3.3.3 Academic value of the research…………………………………………………………………………66 3.3.4 Limitations of the research ……………………………………………………………………………….66
3.4 Summary of Chapter 3……………………………………………………………………………………………67 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….69 References …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….73

The topic of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become one of the most discussed by management science in the first decades of XXI century. The growing interest is based on changes of business models and viewing of CSR as a source of a competitive advantage, which a company can gain to successfully compete on a market (Blagov, 2015). However, just adopting even the best CSR practices themselves cannot guarantee success to those adopters, and that is why it is important to have a right CSR portfolio and the right extent and depth of CSR disclosure.
CSR disclosure is the information that a company discloses about its environmental impact and its relationship with its stakeholders by means of relevant communication channels (Campbell 2004; Gray et al. 2001). In this research the main focus of CSR disclosure is content disclosed: its volume and meaning.
Relevance of the study
The study is relevant due to three reasons. First of all, during crisis times people expect from business more than during good times, and correct communication with people, who are often the customers, is vital. Right extent of CSR disclosure can help to maintain good relationships with customers and investors, therefore mitigating losses or even improving financial performance.
Secondly, composition of board of directors is a quite popular research topic now. There are many studies proving that diversity among members of board of directors brings significant improvements in company’s performance. Therefore, board composition is a tool that can help a company to improve its performance, and the more researches are done in this field the more accurate tool board of directors becomes.
Finally, from the point of view of risk management, expectations of stakeholders and investment decision-making, cost minimization is always an issue in business. Knowing how and where the costs can be reduced without losing or even improving performance is critical to any business. Therefore, right spending on CSR and its further disclosure, which depends on board composition, can help companies to survive crisis times and prosper.
Goal and objectives
The goal of the research is to identify the effects of board composition on company financial and non-financial performance via mediating factor of CSR disclosure. This goal can be reached via completing the following objectives:
1. To justify the relevance of the study;
2. To develop a conceptual model;
3. To identify the proper research approach including data collection and data analysis; 4. To verify the model based on an empirical study;
7
5. To suggest recommendations for researchers on further development of the topic and for practitioners on approaches to CSR disclosure and board composition.
Subject of the research is the effect of board of directors’ composition on bank’s performance via CSR disclosure extent. Object of the research is largest world banks by assets in 2018 financial year.
Research gap and research question
While there are many studies about board and CSR activities and disclosure relationships as well as board and performance, CSR disclosure and performance, there is still a little number of researches that studies mediating effect of board composition on performance via CSR disclosure, what can be beneficial for both companies and academics.
Therefore, research question of this work is how does board composition and CSR disclosure influence company performance (financial and non-financial) in the banking industry? In order to answer this research question, the following research hypotheses are made:
H1: Size of the board negatively influences CSR disclosure.
H2: Number of women on board positively influences CSR disclosure.
H3: CEO duality positively influences CSR disclosure.
H4: CSR disclosure positively influences financial performance.
H5: CSR disclosure positively influences non-financial performance.
H6: Size of the board negatively influences financial performance via mediating effect of CSR disclosure.
H7: Number of women on board positively influences financial performance via mediating effect of CSR disclosure.
H8: CEO duality positively influences financial performance via mediating effect of CSR disclosure.
H9: Size of the board negatively influences non-financial performance via mediating effect of CSR disclosure.
H10: Number of women on board positively influences non-financial performance via mediating effect of CSR disclosure.
H11: CEO duality positively influences non-financial performance via mediating effect of CSR disclosure.

1. About GRI. (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from
https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx
2. Accountability Principles. (2018). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from
https://www.accountability.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/05/AA1000_ACCOUNTABILITY_PRINCIPLES_2018_Single_P ages.pdf
3. Ahmed, K., Hossain, M., & Adams, M. B. (2006). The effects of board composition and board size on the informativeness of annual accounting earnings. Corporate governance: an international review, 14(5), 418-431.
4. Barry, T. A., Lepetit, L., & Tarazi, A. (2011). Ownership structure and risk in publicly held and privately owned banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(5), 1327-1340.
5. Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, F., & Zimmermann, H. (2004). Is board size an independent corporate governance mechanism?. Kyklos, 57(3), 327-356.
6. Bernal‐Conesa, J. A., de Nieves Nieto, C., & Briones‐Peñalver, A. J. (2017). CSR strategy in technology companies: Its influence on performance, competitiveness and sustainability. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 24(2), 96- 107.
7. Bernardi, R. A., & Arnold Sr, D. F. (1997). An examination of moral development within public accounting by gender, staff level, and firm. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(4), 653-668.
8. Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321-324.
9. Blagov Y. E., (2015) Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of concept.
10. Bowen, H. R., & Johnson, F. E. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. Harper.
11. Brand Finance – About Us | Global Brand Valuations – Intangible Assets, Analytics,
Strategy & Transactions. (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from
https://brandfinance.com/who-we-are/
12.Brand Finance – Why Choose Brand Finance | Brand Valuations – Independent, Transparent, Experienced & Flexible. (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from https://brandfinance.com/who-we-are/why-brand-finance/
13. Brand Valuation Methodology | Brandirectory. (2020). Retrieved 9 March 2020, from
https://brandirectory.com/methodology
14. Brandirectory. (2020). Retrieved 3 February 2020, from https://brandirectory.com 15. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Reliability and validity in qualitative research.
73
16. Buchholtz, A., Brown, J., & Shabana, K. (2009). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford Handbooks Online. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0014
17. Campbell, D. (2004). A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companies—a research note. The British Accounting Review, 36(1), 107- 117.
18. Carroll A. B. 1979. A three dimentional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review
19. Causal Research (Explanatory research) – Research-Methodology. (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from https://research-methodology.net/causal-research/
20. Chen, L., Feldmann, A., & Tang, O. (2015). The relationship between disclosures of corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidences from GRI reports in manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 445-456.
21. Coghlan, D., & Holian, R. (2007). Insider action research.
22. Core subjects and issues. (2010). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:26000:ed-1:v1:en
23. Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial management, 5-14.
24. CSR Definition. (2010). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from https://e-csr.net/definitions/csr- definition/#iso-2600-official-definition-of-csr
25. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: A business imperative. Journal of Business strategy.
26. Definition of EXPERIMENT. (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from https://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/experiment
27. Descriptive Research – Research-Methodology. (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from
https://research-methodology.net/descriptive-research/
28. Dey, A. (2008). Corporate governance and agency conflicts. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1143-1181.
29. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business research, 56(6), 465-480.
30. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
74

31. Dwyer, S., Richard, O. C., & Chadwick, K. (2003). Gender diversity in management and firm performance: The influence of growth orientation and organizational culture. Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 1009-1019.
32. Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization science, 14(1), 57-68.
33. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
34. Esa, E., & Ghazali, N. A. M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Malaysian government‐linked companies. Corporate Governance: The
international journal of business in society.ё
35.Ethnography – SAGE Research Methods. (2017). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from
https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-communication-
research-methods/i4910.xml
36. F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. and G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014), “Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research”, European Business Review, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10- 2013-0128
37. Famiyeh, S., Kwarteng, A., & Dadzie, S. A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and reputation: some empirical perspectives. Journal of Global Responsibility.
38. Fombrun, C. J., Van Riel, C. B., & Van Riel, C. (2004). Fame & fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Ft Press.
39. Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of business ethics, 13(3), 205-221.
40. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston: Pitman, 1984). Jennings, in the article cited above, quotes Freeman and gives additional information concerning the influence of his work.
41. Friedman, M. (1962). with the assistance of Rose D. Friedman. (1962). Capitalism and freedom.
42. Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Sanchez-Hernandez, M. I. (2014). Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility for competitive success at a regional level.Journal of Cleaner Production, 72, 14-22.
43. Gill, A. (2008). Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkeley J. Int’l L., 26, 452.
44. Gillan, S. L. (2006). Recent developments in corporate governance: An overview.
75

45. Grounded Theory – an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/grounded-theory
46.Grounded Theory – Research-Methodology. (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from
https://research-methodology.net/research-methods/data-collection/grounded-theory/
47. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
48. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
49. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7‐8), 1034- 1062.
50. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 96-118.
51. Holme, L., & Watts, R. (2001). World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Making Good Business Sense.
52. Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1994). Effect of board members gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 10(1), 35-40.
53. Ienciu, I. A., Popa, I. E., & Ienciu, N. M. (2012). Environmental reporting and good practice of corporate governance: Petroleum industry case study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 961-967.
54. Investopedia. (2019). Retrieved from
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/boardofdirectors.asp
55.ISO 26000 — Social responsibility. (2010). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from
https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html
56. ISO. (2019). ISO 26000 Social responsibility. [online] Available at: https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html [Accessed 2 Jun. 2019].
57. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443-459.
58. Janggu, T., Darus, F., Zain, M. M., & Sawani, Y. (2014). Does good corporate governance lead to better sustainability reporting? An analysis using structural equation modeling. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 138-145.
59.Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 640-655.
76

60. Johnson, Jonathan L., Catherine M. Daily, and Alan E. Ellstrand. 1996. “Boards Of Directors: A Review And Research Agenda”. Journal Of Management 22 (3): 409-438. doi:10.1177/014920639602200303.
61. Kathyayini Rao, Carol Tilt (2016) Board diversity and CSR reporting: an Australian study
62. Khan, H. U. Z. (2010). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: Empirical evidence from private commercial banks of
Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management, 52(2), 82-109.
63. Kotha, S., Rajgopal, S., & Rindova, V. (2001). Reputation building and performance: An empirical analysis of the top-50 pure internet firms. European Management Journal, 19(6),
571-586.
64. Krishnan, G. V., & Parsons, L. M. (2008). Getting to the bottom line: An exploration of
gender and earnings quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1-2), 65-76.
65. Krishnan, G., & Visvanathan, G. (2009). Do auditors price audit committee’s expertise? The case of accounting versus nonaccounting financial experts. Journal of Accounting,
Auditing & Finance, 24(1), 115-144.
66. Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of
financial economics, 93(2), 259-275.
67. Li S, Fetscherin M, Alon I, Lattemann C, Yeh K. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in
emerging markets. Management International Review 50(5): 635–654.
68. Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. The Journal of
social psychology, 137(2), 189-204.
69. Marcoulides, G.A., Chin, W.W. and Saunders, C. (2009), “Foreword: a critical look at
partial least squares modeling”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 171-175.
70. McGuire J. W. 1963. Business and Society. McGraw-Hill: N. Y
71. McKendall, M. A., Sinchez, C. M., & Sicilian, P. (1996, July). Corporate governance and
corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. In Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society (Vol. 7, pp. 167- 178).
72. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.
73. Melero, E. (2011). Are workplaces with many women in management run differently?. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 385-393.
77

74. Möller, V., Koehler, D. A., & Stubenrauch, I. (2015). Finding the value in environmental, social and governance performance. InNew Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 275-283). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.
75. Morris, T., & Wood, S. (1991). Testing the survey method: continuity and change in British industrial relations. Work, Employment and Society, 5(2), 259-282.
76. Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a Neo‐Institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468-494.
77. OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms – Survey Definition. (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=2620
78. Pathan, S. (2009). Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(7), 1340-1350.
79. Platonova, E., Asutay, M., Dixon, R., & Mohammad, S. (2018). The impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on financial performance: Evidence from the GCC Islamic banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 451-471.
80. Preston, L. E., & O’bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419-429.
81. Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292-306.
82. Richter, N. F., Sinkovics, R. R., Ringle, C. M., & Schlaegel, C. (2016). A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 376-404.
83. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner- researchers (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.
84. Rondan-Cataluña, F. J., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Ramírez-Correa, P. E. (2015). A comparison of the different versions of popular technology acceptance models: A non-linear perspective. Kybernetes, 44(5), 788-805.
85. Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal.
86. Salama, A., Anderson, K., & Toms, J. S. (2011). Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006. Business ethics: a European review, 20(2), 192-204.
78

87. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2019). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 1354816618823921.
88. Saunders, M. L., & Lewis, P. (2009). P. & thornhill, a.(2009). Research methods for business students, 4.
89. Scholtens, B. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the international banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 159-175.
90. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. psychology press.
91. Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. The quarterly journal of economics, 98(4), 659-679.
92. Sharif, M., & Rashid, K. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: an empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan. Quality & Quantity, 48(5), 2501-2521.
93. Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Baumgartner, H. (2000). On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(2-3), 195-202.
94. Sundarasen, S. D. D., Je-Yen, T., & Rajangam, N. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Corporate Governance: The
International Journal of Business in Society.
95. Unido.org. (2019). What is CSR? | UNIDO. [online] Available at:
https://www.unido.org/our-focus/advancing-economic-competitiveness/competitive- trade-capacities-and-corporate-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility-market- integration/what-csr [Accessed 2 Jun. 2019].
96. Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values–a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of business ethics, 82(2), 407.
97. Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2017). Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations and future research implications.Journal of Management Control, 28(3), 275-320.
98. Vo, T. N. T. (2010). To be or not to be both CEO and Board Chair. Brook. L. Rev., 76, 65.
99. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial
performance link. Strategic management journal, 18(4), 303-319.
100.What does archival research mean? (2019). Retrieved 3 June 2019, from
https://www.definitions.net/definition/archival+research

Заказать новую

Лучшие эксперты сервиса ждут твоего задания

от 5 000 ₽

Не подошла эта работа?

Закажи новую работу, сделанную по твоим требованиям

Последние выполненные заказы

Хочешь уникальную работу?

Больше 3 000 экспертов уже готовы начать работу над твоим проектом!

Я научный сотрудник федерального музея. Подрабатываю написанием студенческих работ уже 7 лет. 3 года назад начала писать диссертации. Работала на фирмы, а так же помог... Читать все

Я научный сотрудник федерального музея. Подрабатываю написанием студенческих работ уже 7 лет. 3 года назад начала писать диссертации. Работала на фирмы, а так же помогала студентам, вышедшим на меня по рекомендации.

#Кандидатские #Магистерские

37 Выполненных работ

Возможно выполнение работ по правоведению и политологии. Имею высшее образование менеджера ВЭД и правоведа, защитила кандидатскую и докторскую диссертации по политоло... Читать все

Возможно выполнение работ по правоведению и политологии. Имею высшее образование менеджера ВЭД и правоведа, защитила кандидатскую и докторскую диссертации по политологии.

#Кандидатские #Магистерские

68 Выполненных работ

Помогаю с выполнением курсовых проектов и контрольных работ по электроснабжению, электроосвещению, электрическим машинам, электротехнике. Занимался наукой, писал стать... Читать все

#Кандидатские #Магистерские

19 Выполненных работ

Закончила ГУУ с отличием "Бухгалтерский учет, анализ и аудит". Выполнить разные работы: от рефератов до диссертаций. Также пишу доклады, делаю презентации, повышаю уни... Читать все

Закончила ГУУ с отличием "Бухгалтерский учет, анализ и аудит". Выполнить разные работы: от рефератов до диссертаций. Также пишу доклады, делаю презентации, повышаю уникальности с нуля. Все работы оформляю в соответствии с ГОСТ.

#Кандидатские #Магистерские

0 Выполненных работ

Имею 3 высших образования в сфере Экологии и техносферной безопасности (бакалавриат, магистратура, аспирантура), работаю на кафедре экологии одного из опорных ВУЗов РФ... Читать все

Имею 3 высших образования в сфере Экологии и техносферной безопасности (бакалавриат, магистратура, аспирантура), работаю на кафедре экологии одного из опорных ВУЗов РФ. Большой опыт в написании курсовых, дипломов, диссертаций.

#Кандидатские #Магистерские

27 Выполненных работ

Работы пишу исключительно сама на основании действующих нормативных правовых актов, монографий, канд. и докт. диссертаций, авторефератов, научных статей. Дополнительно... Читать все

Работы пишу исключительно сама на основании действующих нормативных правовых актов, монографий, канд. и докт. диссертаций, авторефератов, научных статей. Дополнительно занимаюсь английским языком, уровень владения - Upper-Intermediate.

#Кандидатские #Магистерские

39 Выполненных работ

Выполняю работы по экономическим дисциплинам. Маркетинг, менеджмент, управление персоналом. управление проектами. Есть опыт написания магистерских и кандидатских диссе... Читать все

#Кандидатские #Магистерские

31 Выполненная работа

Занимаю 1 место в рейтинге исполнителей по категориям работ "Научные статьи" и "Эссе". Пишу дипломные работы и магистерские диссертации.

#Кандидатские #Магистерские

5125 Выполненных работ

Наличие красного диплома УрГЮУ по специальности юрист. Опыт работы в профессии - сфера банкротства. Уровень выполняемых работ - до магистерских диссертаций. Написан... Читать все

Наличие красного диплома УрГЮУ по специальности юрист. Опыт работы в профессии - сфера банкротства. Уровень выполняемых работ - до магистерских диссертаций. Написание письменных работ для меня в удовольствие.Всегда качественно.

#Кандидатские #Магистерские

60 Выполненных работ