Кооперация стран в сфере добычи природных ресурсов в Арктике
В последние десятилетия текущие тенденции в развитии мировой экономики, растущий мировой спрос на энергию, истощение традиционных запасов нефти и газа, энергетическая безопасность, ускоренное научно-техническое развитие и обострение экологических проблем, оказали влияние развитие мировой энергетики. Чтобы поддерживать темпы экономического роста, мировое сообщество должно продолжать совершенствовать методы добычи, использования и транспортировки энергоресурсов, что позволит диверсифицировать источники энергии и снизить энергоемкость мировой экономики. Поэтому одной из современных задач мировой энергетики является разработка нетрадиционных и недоступных региональных энергоресурсов. В данном контексте Арктика является одним из самых перспективных районов.
In recent decades, long-term processes, such as current trends in the development of the world economy, growing world energy demand, depletion of traditional oil and gas reserves, energy security, accelerated scientific and technological development, and aggravation of environmental problems have influenced the development of world energy. To maintain the pace of economic growth, the world community must continue to improve the methods of extraction, use and transportation of energy resources, which will diversify energy sources and reduce the energy intensity of the global economy. Therefore, one of the modern challenges of world energy is the development of unconventional and inaccessible regional energy resources.
To maintain the pace of economic growth, the world community must continue to improve the methods of extraction, use and transportation of energy resources, which will diversify energy sources and reduce the energy intensity of the global economy. Therefore, one of the modern challenges of world energy is the development of unconventional and inaccessible regional energy resources in the Arctic region ..
The world has a huge potential for oil and natural gas resources, which includes remote and inaccessible resources of the Arctic shelf. During the period of steadily high world oil prices, there was an increased interest in the development of these resources from the Arctic states, national and international energy companies. The prospect of developing the hydrocarbon resources of the Arctic shelf lies in the possibility of expanding the resource base and increasing energy security.
Interest in oil and gas fields in the Arctic region began to show in Canada, the USA and Russia in the 1920s. Large-scale discoveries were made in the 1940-1950s, which activated oil and gas production in the fields beyond the Arctic Circle. In the late 1980s, significant discoveries of deposits on the shelf of the Arctic seas took place, which led to a new round of activity in the Arctic region. In a period of steadily high oil prices in
The 2011-2014 years there was an increased interest in the development of the Arctic region from both the Arctic and non-regional states, national and international energy companies. The reasons for this interest include the high oil and gas potential of the Arctic shelf, access to oil and gas resources for large energy importers, the importance of hydrocarbon resources for some Arctic countries as a source of income, and the possibility of diversifying energy resources.
For Russia, the development of Arctic offshore oil and gas resources is a strategic priority, an opportunity to stimulate socio-economic development
Arctic region and contribute to technological modernization of the national oil and gas sector.
In view of the changing geopolitical and geo-economic situation, associated primarily with the fall in oil prices, as well as the sanctions imposed on Russia by the European Union and the United States in 2014, the nature and pace of development of Arctic shelf hydrocarbon resources in Russia is changing. In addition, oil and gas production in the Arctic is associated with a number of technological, climatic and logistical difficulties, as well as a relatively high cost of work compared with other oil and gas provinces. At present, there is a need to revise planning and forecasting mechanisms to assess the prospects for the development of oil and gas resources of the Arctic shelf of Russia for the long term, allowing to take into account national strategic interests in the context of modern macroeconomic trends.
The problems of the development of the Arctic resources of oil and natural gas are considered in the works of Russian and foreign researchers, which highlight some aspects of the development of the hydrocarbon resources of the Arctic shelf. However, the study of the prospects for the development of hydrocarbon resources of the Arctic shelf precisely in the context of world cooperation between the countries has not yet received proper development from the point of view of modern trends in world energy. In view of this, there is a need for scientific substantiation of the prospects for the development of oil and gas resources of the Arctic shelf of the Arctic for the long term and determination of the main directions of cooperation between the Arctic countries.
The research object is to determine the main directions of cooperation between Russian and other countries who play leading roles in oil and gas extraction in the Arctic region.
The tasks of this work are the following:
• Examine and compare how mutual cooperation of Russia with different states develop in
the field of natural resources;
• Explain the risks and potential ways of development of such cooperation;
• Provide description of current joint projects.
While analyzing the topic indicated above different materials were used including review of
relevant information provided by different sources: primary sources such as governmental arctic policies, bilateral agreements and documents of the international organisations (for example the Arctic Council), as well as secondary sources that included scholarly books, articles from professional magazines, newspapers and electronic journals;
The first chapter of this work includes examining the reserves of natural resources and determining its part in general Arctic system and pointing out the main objectives provided by the Russian Arctic policy
The second chapter examines the relations and joint projects of Russia with other Arctic states (the Arctic Council): Denmark, Iceland, Canada, Norway, the USA, Finland, Sweden, as well as the relations with China and France, as the states who play significant role in the region
The third chapter provides the information that influences the current cooperation. The important factors related to cooperation development in the Arctic are different risks evolving in oil and gas resources extraction, such as economic, technological, geo-economic, political, environmental. Moreover this chapter describes the participation of Russian oil and gas transnational corporations in modern international Arctic projects and global scenarios of cooperation in the Arctic against the backdrop of the development of the global economy and energy.
Currently, the Arctic is being maintained as a zone of peaceful cooperation and low political tension. I would like to hope that the cooling of relations between Russia and the West due to the events of 2014 will not affect the activities of the Arctic Council. The armed forces of the Arctic countries have begun to cooperate with a view to monitoring the Arctic territories and joint actions in necessary cases for search and rescue operations. The latest decisions taken by the member countries of the Arctic Council have strengthened the organization, as well as advance their international cooperation. Non-regional powers are more and more involved in mutually beneficial cooperation on specified conditions and its profiling in the desired direction. Such countries are attracted to finance research and environmental programs and projects in the Arctic.
Interest in the Arctic does not wane over time, despite the fact that there is still no answer to the question of which direction the climate is changing – to cooling or warming. The intensity of such interest is expressed in the active development of international intercompany cooperation in the oil and gas sector, aimed at the Far North.
In the Arctic, there are a number of contradictions and specific threats that do not appear anywhere else in the world. Since the expansion of the economic development of the Arctic will be comprehensive, it becomes necessary to coordinate different, sometimes conflicting interests. The main problem is the threat of pollution of the Arctic by oil spills during its extraction and transportation. All countries participating in the Arctic Council recognize the principle of sustainable development, at least theoretically, and express their willingness to develop the Arctic, taking into account the protection of the environment, the preservation of its mineral and biological resources, the interests of future generations and the local population, leading a traditional Lifestyle. However, legally this principle is not fixed anywhere. Despite the lack of reliable oil spill response methods, oil and gas companies are already actively exploring hydrocarbon deposits and are preparing for the development of Arctic deposits.
It is necessary to maintain a balance of interests between mining companies and those who are more concerned about the state of the Arctic nature and the stability of the climate. Currently, this task has not been completed. It is also complicated by some changes in the world market, which increase interest in the extraction of oil rather than gas, although from an environmental point of view, the development of offshore gas reserves is less dangerous.
Currently, a number of Western oil and gas companies have suspended or postponed projects for several years near Alaska, the Beaufort Sea and other places in the Far North. Overall, there is a tendency for western companies that used to cooperate with Russian oil giants, to curtail or postpone their own projects in the Arctic. The expansion of the number of
cooperation agreements with Russian oil and gas companies indicates that they intend to work out technological methods in such a part of the Arctic where less demanding environmental standards are applied, as well as, in case of emergency, take the opportunity to share their own financial risks with partner.
Thus it can be concluded that in the current situation, apparently, for Russia there is no other option but to strengthen self-reliance, increase financial support for domestic Arctic projects and for those Russian enterprises that are involved in the development of the Russian Arctic. At the same time, new prospects are opening up for Russia’s interaction with those non- regional powers that are striving for this.
Primary sources:
1. On the Fundamentals of Russian State Policy in the Arctic for the Period Until 2020 and the Future, – 2008
http://static.government.ru/media/files/A4qP6brLNJ175I40U0K46x4SsKRHGfUO.pdf
2. Energy Strategy of Russia for the period until 2035, – 2019 https://minenergo.gov.ru/sites/default/files/documents/11/10/1920/document-66308.pdf
3. The Spitsbergen Treaty, -1920 http://library.arcticportal.org/1909/1/The_Svalbard_Treaty_9ssFy.pdf
4. National Security Strategy of the United States of America, – 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
5. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 08.01.2009 No. 4 (as amended on 05/06/2016) http://www.consultant.ru/document/Cons_doc_LAW_83826/92d969e26a4326c5d02fa79b8f9cf4 994ee5633b
6. Presentation of the Ministry of Energy of Russia (The official website of the Ministry of Energy, 2017) https://minenergo.gov.ru/node/7687
7. The Prirazlomnoye project (The official website of Gazprom, 2018) https://www.gazprom- neft.com/company/major-projects/prirazlomnoe/
8. Offshore projects, 2019 https://www.rosneft.ru/business/Upstream/offshore/
9. Executive Order 13795, “Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy”, – 2017 https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-05-03/pdf/2017-09087.pdf
10. Finland’s Strategy for the Arctic Region. URL: http://www.vnk.fi/julkaisukansio/ 2010/j07suomen-arktinen-08-finlands-strategy/pdf/en.pdf.
11. Sweden’s Strategy for the Arctic Region, URL: https://www.government.se/49b746/contentassets/85de9103bbbe4373b55eddd7f71608da/swede ns-strategy-for-the-arctic-region
12. PJSC “Lukoil” Annual Report, – 2015, URL: https://fs.moex.com/content/annualreports/1967/2/lukoyl-angl.pdf
Secondary sources:
1. Osofsky, H.M. Shadian, J. Arctic Energy Cooperation/ H.M. Osofsky, J. Shadian//UC Davis Law Review – 2016. No1431, pp. 1-51
2. Zhang, X. Tu J. Research on Current International Cooperation in the Context of Economic Rediscovery of the Arctic / X.Zhang, J.Tu// China Oceans Law Review – 2011, pp. 977-983
3. Kaczynski, V. Russian Arctic Resource Development and Related Policy Considerations, vol. 14, Georgetown University Press, 2013 – pp. 187-188
4. Litvinenko V. Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources, vol.2, CRC Press – 2019, p. 643
5. Zagorski A. The Arctic: Zone of Peace and Cooperation, IMEMO RAN – 2011, p. 46
6. Hobart, M.K. Oil and Natural Gas Resources of the Arctic, URL: https://geology.com/articles/arctic-oil-and-gas/
7. East Coast and Arctic Council, Wood Mackenzie web-site, URL: https://www.woodmac.com/reports/upstream-oil-and-gas-east-coast-and-arctic-canada-upstream- in-review-26036194
8. Analyses of Key Companies Having Business Operations in the Arctic, URL: https://insights.nordea.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Analyses-of-Key-Companies-having- Business-Operating-In-the-Arctic_0.pdf
9. Ministry of Energy: Exploration in the Arctic could be twice as profitable, URL: https://rg.ru/2018/03/27/minenergo-geologorazvedka-v-arktike-mozhet-stat-v-dva-raza- vygodnee.html
10. Ermachenkov, I. RES for the Russian Arctic: alternative energy for remote areas, URL: https://bellona.ru/2019/07/16/renewable-arctic/
11. Popel, O., Kiseleva S., Morgunova M. Use of renewable energy sources for energy supply to consumers in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, Arctic:Ecology and Economics No1-17, – 2015, pp. 65-67
12. Alternative energy for the “Russian Arctic” on Franz Josef Land, URL: https://regnum.ru/news/economy/2491110.html
13. Panichkin, I. Development of Marine Oil and Gas Resources of the Arctic. Current status and prospects, – 2018, URL:http://russiancouncil.ru/arcticoil
14. Gazprom Neft continues to count on PetroVietnam’s participation in the Dolginsky project, – 2017, URL: http://www.ngv.ru/news/gazprom_neft_prodolzhaet_rasschityvat_na_uchastie_petrovietnam_v_ dolginskom_proekte_/?sphrase_id=480489
15. Another 2 years to think about. Rosneft, Seadrill and NADL agree to extend the framework agreement, 2017 https://neftegaz.ru/news/Acquisitions/209908-eshche-2-goda-na-podumat- rosneft-seadrill-i-nadl-dogovorilis-o-prodlenii-ramochnogo-soglasheniya/
16. Pavlovsky, S. Novak: The Arctic already provides 17% of total production oil in the Russian Federation, – 2017, URL: https://teknoblog.ru/2017/03/29/76377
17. V. Petleva, V.,Gazprom Neft Calls Partners to Arctic, – 2017, URL: www.vedomosti.ru/business/articles/2017/03/29/683288-gazprom-neft
18. V. Pertsova, Oil in the Arctic: how Russian oil companies act under sanctions, URL:www.forbes.ru/biznes/343165-neft-v-arktike-kak-rossiyskie-neftyanye-kompanii- deystvuyut-v-usloviyah-sankciy
19. Antiyushina, N. Arctic: A New Franwork of the International Cooperation, Reports of the Institute of Europe No307, pp. 13-14
20. Soren, L. Danish-Russian Interfaces: the Arctic and the Baltic Sea Region, Russia International Affairs Council No54, 2020, p. 20
21. Wallace, R. The Arctic is warming and turning red: implications for Canada and Russia in evolving Polar region, Canadian Global Affairs Institute, – 2019
22. Poval, V. Russian-Norwegian Agreements on the Division of Arctic Spaces, Arctic and the North No. 6, – 2012, 18
23. Vilegzhanin, A, Zilanoa V, Svalbard: legal regime of adjacent marine areas, Theory and Practice of Maritime Activities,. No. 10, – 2006, p. 9
24. Chuprov, V., Norway should not produce oil on offshore Svalbard, URL: http://www.greenpeace.org/russia/ru/news/blogs/green-planet/blog/52821/
25. Krivorotov, A., The Unequal Division in Half: to the Signing of the Russian-Norwegian Agreement on the Delimitation in the Arctic, – 2017
26. Arne Treholt, Grey zones, International relations, – 2016, p. 63
27. Flegentova A., The Russian-Norwegian Relations: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, Topical issues of contemporary international relations No 5, – 2013, p. 30
28. O’Rourke R. Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress, Washington, Congressional Research Service, – 2018, URL: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41153.pdf
29. Blank S., Exploring the Significane of China’s Membership on the Arctic Council, China Brief, vol. 13, iss. 14, – 2013, URL: https://jamestown.org/program/exploring-the-significance- of-chinas-membership-on-the-arctic-council
30. Tarakanov, M. Transport projects in the Arctic: synchronization, complexity, Vestnik Kolskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, no. 1, – 2014, pp. 80–85
31. Sørensen, C.T.N. Klimenko, E. Emerging Chinese-Russian Cooperation in The Arctic. Possibilities and constraints, SIPRI Policy Paper, no. 46, – 2017, URL: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2017-06/emeging-chinese-russian-cooperation-arctic.pdf
32. Menkiszak, M. Russia and the West: What Went Wrong and Can We Do Better?, URL: https://dgap.org/sites/default/files/aticle_downloads/ostpolitikworkingpapermenkiszak.pdf
33. Jiping, Zh. China National Petroleum Corporation : Annual report, – 2013, URL: http://www.cnpc.com.cn/en/2013ru/201407/9162442c8cf34006ad9b48f0c964dca5/files/8ab7e29 86ae4ed096a33c128dc8578b.pdf
34. Henderson J. Russian LNG: Progress and Delay in 2017, URL: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Russian-LNG- %E2%80%93-Progress-and-delay-in-2017-OIES-Energy-Insight.pdf
35. Klimenko, E. Patterns of and Incentives for Entry into the Arctic and South-East Asia. URL: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/atterns-of-and-Incentives-for-Entry-into-the-Arctic-and- South-East-Asia.pdf
36. Staalesen, A. Russians Choose Chinese Explorers for Arctic Oil, The Independent Barents Observer, – 2016, URL: https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/industry/2016/04/russians-choose- chinese-explorers-arctic-oil
37. Valantin, J.M. The Russian Arctic Meets the Chinese New Silk Road, – 2017. URL: https://www.redanalysis.org/2016/10/31/the-russian-arctic-meets-the-chinese-new-silk-road
38. Valantin, J.M. Russian Arctic Oil: A New Economic & Strategic Paradigm?, – 2017. URL: https://www.redanalysis.org/2016/10/10/russian-arctic-oil-new-economic-strategic-paradigm
39: Savinsky, S., Smakhtin D, Development banks of China, Money and credit, – 2007, URL: https://www.cbr.ru/publ/Money-AndCredit/china.pdf
40. Zubareva, V., .Sarkisov A., Andreev, A., Oil and gas investment projects: efficiency and risks, Nedra Publishing House, – 2010, pp. 49-60
41. Makarova, A., Grigoryeva, L., Mitrova T. The evolution of world energy markets and its consequences for Russia, INEI RAS, – 2015, pp. 205-208
42. Kozenyasheva, M. Features of forecasting oil prices in modern conditions, Issues of Economics and Law, – 2011, pp. 331-339
43.Jokela, J. Arctic Governance, in Arctic Security Matters, Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, – 2015, p. 39
44. Morgunova, M, Wesphal, K. Offshore Hydrocarbon Resources in the Arctic: From Cooperation to Confrontation in an Era of Geopolitical and Economic Turbulence?, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin, – 2016, p. 30
45. Chen, Z, Osadetz, K. Geological risk mapping and prospect evaluation using multivariate and Bayesian statistical methods, western Sverdrup Basin of Canada, AAPG BULLETIN, – 2006), pp. 859–872
Последние выполненные заказы
Хочешь уникальную работу?
Больше 3 000 экспертов уже готовы начать работу над твоим проектом!
4.8 (40 отзывов)
4.4 (93 отзыва)
5 (145 отзывов)
4.7 (18 отзывов)
4.2 (13 отзывов)
4.2 (6 отзывов)
4.8 (211 отзывов)
4.6 (522 отзыва)
4.6 (30 отзывов)
