Роль репатриантов в формировании производительности, инновационности и поглощающей способности компаний
Исследовательская цель: найти связь между наличием репатриантов и производительностью, инновационностью и поглощающей способностью компаний. Исследовательские вопросы: 1. Какие факторы влияют на решение репатриантов вернуться в родную страну? 2) Как наличие репатриантов влияет на производительность, инновационность и поглощающую способность компаний? 3) Каким образом управление талантливыми сотрудниками связывает наличие репатриантов, производительность, инновационность и поглощающую способность компаний? Основные результаты: 1) Факторы, которые больше всего влияют на решение репатриантов вернуться домой: карьерные амбиции, больше возможностей для самореализации, развитые поглощающие способности местных компаний, привлекательные факторы родной страны и желание развивать национальную экономику. 2) Само по себе наличие репатриантов не оказывает значительного влияния на производительность, инновационность и поглощающую способность компаний. Вместо этого, знания, которыми делятся репатрианты с коллегами, влияют на данные показатели. 3) Привлечение и развитие талантливых сотрудников модерирует отношение между наличием репатриантов и производительностью, инновационностью и поглощающей способностью компаний, в то время как сохранение талантливых сотрудников оказывает негативное влияние на данную связь.
INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Chapter 1. LITERATURE REVIEW ……………………………………………………………………………………… 6 1.1. Return migration and returnees……………………………………………………………………………………. 6 1.1.1. Return migration ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 1.1.2. Evolution of studies on returnees ……………………………………………………………………………. 8 1.2. Effect of returnees’ presence in companies ………………………………………………………………….. 11 1.2.1.
Effect of returnees on firm performance ………………………………………………………………… 11 1.2.2.
Effect of returnees on innovations…………………………………………………………………………. 12 1.2.3.
Effect of returnees on firms’ absorptive capacity ……………………………………………………. 14 1.2.4.
Knowledge-sharing from returnees……………………………………………………………………….. 15 1.3. TM practices for returnees ………………………………………………………………………………………… 18 1.3.1. Defining talent management ………………………………………………………………………………… 18 1.3.2. Returnees and talent management ………………………………………………………………………… 19
Chapter 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY …………………………………………………………………………. 22 2.1. The Russian context ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 2.2. Setting and data ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 2.3. Questionnaire description………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27 2.4. Variables and measures…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27 2.4.1. Reasons to return/to employ returnees ………………………………………………………………….. 27 2.4.2.
Talent management …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27 2.4.3. Absorptive capacity …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28 2.4.4.
Firm performance ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 2.4.5. Innovation activity………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28
Chapter 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION …………………………………………………………………………… 29 CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 41 LIST OF REFERENCES ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 44 APPENDIX ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 54
Overseas returnees have recently become a subject of academic interest (Cerdin, Abdeljalil Diné, Brewster, 2013; Dietz, Joshi, Esses, Hamilton & Gabarrot, 2015; Crowley-Henry & Al Ariss, 2018). Scholars emphasize that effective management of trained returnees is essential because they have human capital (i.e. international experience, knowledge of foreign markets, ability to solve cross-cultural conflicts) needed for increasing firm productivity and innovativeness. Hence, these people constitute important strategic resources as they allow their firms to overcome competitors and to increase market share (Guo & Al Ariss, 2015; Zikic, 2015).
Research problem: while many studies discuss the role of returnees in developing national economies of their home countries, we still don’t know how returnees’ presence influences on firm performance, innovations, and absorptive capacity. Since these people acquire unique human capital which may become a competitive advantage for local companies, we assume that they have a positive effect on aforementioned indicators. Given that, we need to determine whether talent management shapes the effect of returnees’ presence on firms’ absorptive capacity, innovation activity and performance. And if there is a positive effect, what exact practices should be implemented to manage returnees.
Research goal: to identify the relationship between returnees’ presence and firm performance, innovation activity and firm’s absorptive capacity.
Research questions:
1. What factors determine returnees’ decisions to come back?
2. How does returnees’ presence influence on firm performance, innovations, and
absorptive capacity?
3. How TM practices shape the link between returnees’ presence, firms’ absorptive
capacity, innovation activity and performance?
We determined key factors that had the strongest effect on returnees’ decisions to come back to their home country: work ambitions, expected higher return to returnees’ human capital and absorptive capacity in local companies, home country’s pulling factors and returnees’ desire to contribute to its national economy. These factors intersect with those we found in the literature (Mayr & Peri, 2008; Biondo et al., 2012; Kenney et al., 2013; Wong, 2014; Kautto, 2019).
Returnees’ human capital acquired abroad, international work experience and social networks in foreign countries are their most significant competitive advantages over local employees. It proves that companies see overseas returnees as key drivers of their international expansion (Kureková & Žilinčíková, 2018; Li, 2020).
According to our returnee respondents, the most important TM practices that companies should implement to attract, develop, and retain returnees are access to training and education programs, engagement in R&D and other innovation activities, various career advancement opportunities and strong employer brand that takes care of its talented employees. From the companies’ perspective, talent retention is a TM group most our respondents focus on. However, during the analysis of gathered data, we found out that this group of practices had a negative effect on firm performance and innovations, meaning that firms should switch their focus to talent development, which is highly valued by overseas returnees. It broadens existing research on this topic since scholars usually analyze the relationship between returnees and TM and don’t focus on distinct TM practices.
Furthermore, returnees’ presence doesn’t have a significant effect on firm performance, innovations, and absorptive capacity by itself. Instead, knowledge and skills that overseas returnees share with their colleagues play a crucial role in shaping aforementioned indicators. It may be explained by a fact that overseas returnees complete difficult tasks, improve group work and acquire international experience and knowledge of foreign markets, which is essential for companies that want to expand internationally. Moreover, returnees share their ideas, while being involved into R&D and other innovation activities, hence, impacting on existing products’ design or developing new products. Finally, returnees help their management to manage internal knowledge transfers more efficiently, thus, increasing absorptive capacity of companies they work for. It broadens
41
existing research on returnees and their effect on aforementioned indicators, especially in the Russian context.
1. Adam, E. E. (1994). Alternative quality improvement practices and organizational performance. Journal of Operations Management, pp. 27-44.
2. Ai, B., & Wang, L. (2017). Homeland Integration: An Academic Returnee’s Experiences in Chinese Universities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, pp. 1-9.
3. Ali, M., Kan, K. A., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Direct and configurational paths of absorptive capacity and organizational innovation to successful organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), pp. 5317-5323.
4. Apriliyanti, I. D., & Alon, I. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of absorptive capacity. International Business Review, 26(5), pp. 896-907.
5. Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2020). The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and productivity. European Economic Review, 123.
6. Becker, G. S. (1994). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. The University of Chicago Press, pp. 15-45.
7. Bhalla, V., Caye, J.-M., Lovich, D., & Tollman, P. (2018). A CEO’s guide to Talent Management today. Boston Consulting Group. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2018/ceo-guide-talent-management-today.aspx.
8. Biondo, A. E., Monteleone, S., Skonieczny, G., & Torrisi, B. (2012). The propensity to return: Theory and evidence for the Italian brain drain. Economics Letters, 115, pp. 359-362.
9. Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2007). Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: Evidence from a three-country study. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(3), pp. 430-446.
10. Canh, N. T., Liem, N. T., Thu, P. A., & Khuong, N. V. (2019). The Impact of Innovation on Firm Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms. Sustainability, 11(13), pp. 1-14.
11. Cerase, F. P. (1974). Expectations and Reality: A Case Study of Return Migration From the United States to Southern Italy. International Migration Review, 8(2), pp. 245-262.
12. Cerdin, J.-L., Abdeljalil Diné, M., & Brewster, C. (2013). Qualified immigrants’ success: Exploring the motivation to migrate and to integrate. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, pp. 151-168.
13. Chen, S. (2017). The Relationship between Innovation and Firm Performance: A Literature Review. Advances in Computer Science Research, 82, pp. 648-652.
44
14. Chen, Y. (2008). The Limits of Brain Circulation: Chinese Returnees and Technological Development in Beijing. Pacific Affairs, 81(2), pp. 195-215.
15. Chrysostome, E., & Nkongolo-Bakenda, JM. (2019). Diaspora and International Business in the Homeland: From Impact of Remittances to Determinants of Entrepreneurship and Research Agenda. Diaspora Networks in International Business, pp. 17-39.
16. Claus, L. (2019). HR disruption – Time already to reinvent talent management. Business Research Quarterly (BQR), 22, pp. 207-215.
17. Collings, D. G., Mellahi, K., & Cascio, W. F. (2019). Global Talent Management and Performance in Multinational Enterprises: A Multilevel Perspective. Journal of Management, 45(2), pp. 540-567.
18. Crowley-Henry, M., & Al Ariss, A. (2018). Talent management of skilled migrants: propositions and an agenda for future research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(13), pp. 2054-2079.
19. Cui, L. (2015). Leadership Experience Meets Ownership Structure: Returnee Managers and Internationalization of Emerging Economy Firms. Management International Review, 55, pp. 355-387.
20. Cummings, E. A., & Gamlen, A. (2019). Diaspora engagement institutions and venture investment activity in developing countries. Journal of International Business Policy, 2(4), pp. 289-313.
21. D’Angelo, A., Ganotakis, P., & Love, J. H. (2020). Learning by exporting under fast, short-term changes: The moderating role of absorptive capacity and foreign collaborative agreements. International Business Review, 29(3).
22. Dietz, J., Joshi, C., Esses, V. M., Hamilton, L. K., & Gabarrot, F. (2015). The skill paradox: Explaining and reducing employment discrimination against skilled migrants. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26, pp. 1318-1334.
23. Doğan, M., & Doğan, H. (2020). Knowledge Sharing, Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey. Financial Studies, 24(1), pp. 36-52.
24. Dokko, G., & Jiang, W. (2017). Managing Talent across Organizations: The Portability of Individual Performance. In D.G. Collings, K. Mellahi & W. F. Cascio (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Talent Management (pp. 115-134). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
45
25. Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), pp. 272-285.
26. Dustmann, C., & Weiss, Y. (2007). Return Migration: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(2), pp. 236-256.
27. Filatochev, I., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2009). The Export Orientation and Export Performance of High-Technology SMEs in Emerging Markets: The Effects of Knowledge Transfer by Returnee Entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, pp. 1005-1021.
28. Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), pp. 98-116.
29. Frenkel, M. (2017). Is Migration Good for an Economy? A Survey of the Main Economic Effects. Journal for Markets and Ethics, 5(1), pp. 13-22.
30. Fu, X., Hou, J., & Sanfilippo, M. (2017). Highly skilled returnees and the internationalization of EMNEs: Firm level evidence from China. International Business Review, 26(3), pp. 579-591.
31. Gagné, F. (2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development through DMGT-Based analysis. In K. A. Heller (Ed.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 66-67). Oxford: Elsevier.
32. Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Thunnissen, M., & Scullion, H. (2020). Talent management: context matters. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(4), pp. 457-473.
33. Gao, S., Xu, K., & Yang, J. (2008). Managerial ties, absorptive capacity, and innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3), pp. 395-412.
34. Gaur, A. S., Ma, H., & Ge, B. (2019). MNC strategy, knowledge transfer context, and knowledge flow in MNEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), pp. 1885-1900.
35. Gomez de Leon, J., & Partida, V. (1986). Completeness of Enumeration of the 1980 Census of Mexico: An Appraisal Based on New Estimates of Intercensal Net Migration, 1960-1980. (Proceedings of the Second Annual Research Conference (Reston, Virginia, March 23-26, 1986)). U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
36. Grillitsch, M., & Nilsson, M. (2017). Firm performance in the periphery: on the relation between firm-internal knowledge and local knowledge spillovers. Regional Studies, 51(8), 1219-1231.
46
37. Guo, S., & Al Ariss, A. (2015). Human resource management of international migrants: Current theories and future research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26, pp. 1287-1297.
38. Hamelink, M., & Opdenakker, R. (2019). How business model innovation affects firm performance in the energy storage market. Renewable energy, 131, pp. 120-127.
39. Hao, Y., Fan, C., Long, Y., & Pan, J. (2019). The role of returnee executives in improving green innovation performance of Chinese manufacturing enterprises: Implications for sustainable development strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, pp. 804-818.
40. Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), pp. 476-501.
41. Holden, N., & Vaiman, V. (2013). Talent management in Russia: Not so much war for talent as wariness of talent. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 9(1/2), pp. 129-146.
42. Hu, X., Li, J., & Jin, Z. (2019). How ordinary returnees and foreigners drive firms’ exports? Review of International Business and Strategy, 29(1), pp. 2-24.
43. International mobility. Retrieved from https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/people/development/mobility-factsheet.
44. Iontsev, V. A., Zimova, N. S., & Subbotin, A. A. (2017). The Problems of “Brain Drain” in Russia and Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). RUDN Journal of Economics, 25(4), pp. 510-517.
45. Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2008). Could HRM support organizational innovation? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(7), pp. 1208-1221.
46. Jooss, S., Burbach, R., & Ruël, H. (2019). Examining talent pools as a core talent management practice in multinational corporations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.
47. Kautto, D. (2019). Social influences in cross-border entrepreneurial migration policy. Journal of International Business Policy, 2, pp. 397-412.
48. Kenney, M., Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2013). Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of high tech industries. Research Policy, 42, pp. 391-407.
49. Kesidou, E., & Romijn, H. A. (2014). Local Knowledge Spillovers and Innovation in Clusters in Developing Countries. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254766447_Local_Knowledge_Spillovers_and_Innovatio n_in_Clusters_in_Developing_Countries.
47
50. Khan, Z., Lew, Y. K., & Marinova, S. (2019). Exploitative and exploratory innovations in emerging economies: The role of realized absorptive capacity and learning intent. International Business Review, 28(3), pp. 499-512.
51. Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The design of organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
52. Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
53. Kogut, C. S., & Mello, R. C. (2017). Reverse Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Companies: A Systematic Literature Review. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922017000100305.
54. Kritz, M. M. (1987). International migration policies: conceptual problems. International Migration Review, 21(4), pp. 947-950.
55. Kubat, D. (1984). The politics of return: International return migration in Europe (Proceedings of the First European Conference on International Return Migration (Rome, November 11-14, 1981)). New York: Center for Migration Studies.
56. Kureková, L. M., & Žilinčíková, Z. (2018). What is the value of foreign work experience for young return migrants? International Journal of Manpower, 39(1), pp. 71-92.
57. Kuznetsov, Y. (2006). Diaspora Networks and the International Migration of Skills: How countries Can Draw on their Talent Abroad. WBI Development Studies. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 3-9.
58. Latek, M. (2017). Reintegration of returning migrants. European Parliamentary Research Service, October 2017, p. 2.
59. Latukha, M. O., & Veselova, A. (2019). Talent management, absorptive capacity, and firm performance: Does it work in China and Russia? Human Resource Management, 58(5), pp. 503-519.
60. Latukha, M. O., Selivanovskikh, L. V., & Mitskevich, E.A. (2019). Talent Management Practices and Absorptive Capacity of Russian Companies. Russian Management Journal, 17(1), pp. 5-28.
61. Lee, R., Lee, J.-H., & Garrett, T. C. (2019). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, pp. 507-515.
48
62. Li, H. (2020). Role of overseas ethnic and non-ethnic ties and firm activity in the home country in the internationalization of returnee entrepreneurial firms. Journal of International Management, 26(1).
63. Li, H., Zhang Y., & Li Y. (2012). Returnees Versus Locals: Who Perform Better in China’s Technology Entrepreneurship? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), pp. 257-272.
64. Li, M., & Pu, H. (2017). Recruiting returnees: A Study of Chinese University Presidents’ Perceptions of Foreign-Educated Returnees at Chinese Universities. Journal of Media Critiques. Retrieved from https://mediacritiques.net/index.php/jmc/article/viewFile/151/111.
65. Lin, D., Lu, J., Liu, X., & Choi, S.-J. (2014). Returnee CEO and Innovation in Chinese high-tech SMEs. International Journal Technology Management, 65(1-4), pp. 151-171.
66. Liu, Q., Han, Q., Liu, R., & Lu, R. (2017). A Tale of “Sea Turtles”: Returnee Entrepreneurship, Institutions, and Firm Performance. Alberta School of Business. Research Paper No. 2017-702.
67. Liu, X. H., Lu, J. Y., Filatochev, I., Buck, T., Wright, M. (2010). Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers and innovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), pp. 1183-1197.
68. Liu, X., Xia, T., Lu, J., & Lin, D. (2019). Under what institutional conditions does overseas business knowledge contribute to firm performance? International Business Review, 28(3), pp. 588-602.
69. Loschmann, C., & Marchand, K. (2020). The labor market reintegration of returned refugees in Afghanistan. Small Business Economics.
70. Luintel, K. B., & Khan, M. (2017). Ideas production and international knowledge spillovers: Digging deeper into emerging countries. Research Policy, 46(10), pp. 1738-1754.
71. Luo, S., Lovely, M. E., & Popp, D. (2013). Intellectual Returnees as Drivers of Indigenous Innovation: Evidence from the Chinese Photovoltaic Industry. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w19518.pdf.
72. Ma, Z., Zhu, J., Meng, Y., & Teng, Y. (2019). The impact of overseas human capital and social ties on Chinese returnee entrepreneurs’ venture performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(1), pp. 67-83.
73. Madsen, T. L., Mosakowski, E., & Zaheer, S. (2003). Knowledge retention and personnel mobility: the nondisruptive effects of inflows of experience. Organization Science, 14(2), pp. 173-191.
49
74. Matusik, S. F., Heeley, M. B., & Amorós, J. E. (2019). Home court advantage? Knowledge-based FDI and spillovers in emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 9(3), pp. 405-422.
75. Mayr, K., & Peri, G. (2008). Return migration as channel of brain gain. NBER Working Paper No. 14039.
76. Mcdonnell, A., Collings, D. G., Mellahi, K., & Schuler, R. S. (2017). Talent management: A systematic review and future prospects. European Journal of International Management, 11(1), pp. 86-128.
77. McKinsey & Co. (2017). Attracting and retaining the right talent. Retrieved from
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/attracting-and-retaining- the-right-talent.
78. Meyers, M. C., Woerkom, M., Paauwe, J., & Dries, N. (2020). HR managers’ talent philosophies: prevalence and relationships with perceived talent management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(4), pp. 562-588.
79. Nadayama, N. (2019). Isolated Foreign Subsidiary’s Initiative in Knowledge Transfer Within the MNE. Journal of International Management, 25(2).
80. Neely, A., Filippini, R., Forza, C., Vinelli, A., & Hii, J. (2001). A framework for analyzing business performance, firm innovation and related contextual factors: Perceptions of managers and policy makers in two European regions. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), pp. 114-124.
81. Obukhova, E. (2012). Why Not All Sea-Turtles Become Brokers: The Conflict between Category Membership and Brokerage among Returnee-Firms in China. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4899-11, May 2012.
82. Obukhova, E., & Wang, Y. (2012). The Power of Local Networks: Returnee Entrepreneurs, School Ties, and Firm Performance. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. Retrieved from https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/ambpp.2013.10740abstract.
83. Over 4 in 5 employers willing to hire overseas: report. Retrieved from https://sbr.com.sg/hr-education/news/over-4-in-5-employers-willing-hire-overseas-returnees-report.
84. Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), pp. 217-237.
85. PwC (2017). CEO Pulse Survey. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.ie/publications/2017/pwc-ireland-ceo-pulse-survey.pdf.
50
86. Ramadani, V., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana L.-P., Rexhepi, G., & Ibraimi, S. (2017). The impact of knowledge spillovers and innovation on firm-performance: findings from the Balkans countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13, pp. 299-325.
87. Reiche, B. S., Lee, Y., & Allen, D. G. (2019). Actors, structure, and processes: A review and conceptualization of global work integrating IB and HRM research. Journal of Management, 45(2), pp. 359-383.
88. Renard, T., Malet, D., Coolsaet, R., & Ginkel, V. B. (2018). Returnees – Who are they, why are they (not) coming back and how should we deal with them? Assessing Policies on Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Egmont-Royal Institute for International Relations. Egmont Paper 101.
89. Rukundo, J. B. (2017). Firm performance and innovation in the developing countries: Evidence from firm-level survey. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1), pp. 235-245.
90. Saxenian, A. (2006). The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Harvard University Press, pp. 88-93.
91. Schultz, T. W. (1993). The economic importance of human capital in modernization. Education Economics, 1(1), pp. 13-19.
92. Scullion, H., Collings, D. G., & Caligiuri, P. (2010). Global talent management. Journal of World Business, 45(2), pp. 105-108.
93. Song, J., & Wen, W. (2016). Can Directors’ Foreign Experience Promote Corporate Innovation? China Soft Science, 11, pp. 109-120.
94. Sparrow, P. R., & Makram, H. (2015). What is the value of talent management? Building value-driven processes within a talent management architecture. Human Resource Management Review, 25(3), pp. 249-263.
95. Stark, O., & Taylor, E. J. (1991). Migration Incentives, Migration Types: The Role of Relative Deprivation. Economic Journal, 101(408), pp. 1163-1178.
96. Tansley, C., Turner, P., Carley, F., Harris, L., Sempik, A., & Stewart, J. (2007). Talent: strategy, management, measurement. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), pp. 8-9.
97. Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. The American Economic Review, 59(1), p. 140.
Последние выполненные заказы
Хочешь уникальную работу?
Больше 3 000 экспертов уже готовы начать работу над твоим проектом!